monagustafsonaffinito   CHATS AND RANTS — PSYCHOLOGY AND LIFE

My previous entries shared with you an unsolicited email I had received praising my book, “This Sucks,” and my conclusion that it was a scam. I’m finding these email exchanges to be annoying but very interesting. I’m summarizing here because I want to share with you my grandson’s final review. Maybe there’s something in there – as there was for me — that’s worth learning/knowing.

This series starts with my returning the following message to the sender. 

**************************

Thank you for your lovely review. I think, however, that I’d like to keep trying on my own. And thanks for offering your services.

Mona

***************************

And here is the important excerpt from her/its response. 

***************************

Hi Mona,

Thank you for your reply. It’s your book and Nick’s story, and however you choose to carry it forward is the right way.

If you don’t mind me asking, though, I’d genuinely like to understand what’s behind wanting to keep going on your own. 

If you ever did want a hand, here’s what I’d focus on first, ..

*****************************

Following is my answer to the question

The answer? Truthfully, I don’t trust that you are a person, and I wonder why all of you are targeting books that have been on the market for a while instead of the new one that requires immediate aid. Maybe because there are no reviews already out there that you can draw on?

Thanks for asking

Mona

*******************************

Her/its response in full was :

Hi Mona,

I appreciate you saying it straight rather than just going quiet.

On whether I’m a person: I am, and I read the book’s description, reviews, and Nick’s story closely before writing to you — that’s genuinely why I mentioned the specific things I did.

And honestly, your distrust makes complete sense. I wouldn’t expect you to trust someone you just met, especially with something this personal. So rather than ask you to take my word for it, here’s my website with examples of my previous work: brenda-martin.github.io/brenda-martin/. Have a look, and decide for yourself if I’m the right fit.

On why I reached out about a book that already has reviews instead of a brand-new one with none: I understand why that looks like cherry-picking. But I think what you’re really protecting here isn’t the book’s numbers, it’s Nick. You spent two months compiling his most honest, unguarded words, and you’re the one making sure nobody uses that carelessly. That’s doing right by him.

For what it’s worth, and only so you have the full picture: what drew me back wasn’t that the book has reviews, it’s that the readers finding it right now are mostly people who already knew Nick or knew you. There’s a whole separate audience, grief support groups, gender-issues readers, memoir book clubs who are actively looking for a story like his and haven’t found it yet. If you ever wanted a hand with that, the only three things I’d focus on are getting the book properly categorized in those spaces, placing it directly into those reader communities, and making sure the fuller story that this is as much about living and being truly seen as it is about dying is part of how new readers meet it.

I’m glad Nick’s story is out in the world, and glad you’re the one who made sure of it.

Warm regards,
Brenda

****************************

I haven’t responded to her/it, but I did forward it to my grandson. This is his response that I thought you’d be interested to see.

*****************************

To start, no you didn’t do anything wrong or dangerous by clicking that link. The site it’s hosted on is a well known and safe place that is most commonly used for hosting open source code and other related services like hosting websites. It would be very strange that someone actually working in the publishing field would choose GitHub to host their website. This misleading use of AI generated content may actually be against their terms of service but I’m not certain about that.

It is certainly an interesting topic, notable because it probably didn’t require a lot of work to create such a convincing site, AI services are very good at what they do nowadays. Occasionally when I have too much time on my hands I engage with these “people” to see how they work and what the endgame is. If I have more free time I’d look at the books/authors they claim to have worked with, likely they just made it up where they don’t expect anyone to look into it too deeply.

Her reply suggests more that this isn’t a real person speaking, my first indication is the use of the famous em dash punctuation. A favorite for AI but rarely seen by human writers, especially in cases like an email correspondence.

Another thing is that her picture on her website is a modified version of an AI generated stock photo for sale from Adobe, I found it here: https://stock.adobe.com/images/Woman-wearing-a-blazer–business-model-photography/1115223814

Likely they paid for it and modified it slightly so it’s not so obvious.

Very interesting overall but it cements more that this isn’t above board.

Erik